Another Canuck mom tries to take over the blogiverse.

<< August 2006 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31

Contact Me:

Links

Canadian Blogs
Martinis For Milk
Beanie Baby
Toronto Blogs
Where am I going and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Her Bad Mother
Her Bad Mother's Basement


International Blogs
Sarcastic Journalist
Mr. Nice Guy
The Blog I Don't Share With Friends & Family
...so I stabbed him in the head with a fork
The Blog I Don't Share With Friends & Family
Diary of a Reluctant Housewife
Underpaid Kept Woman
Cynical Dad
Poop and Boogies


Breastfeeding Reference
Kelly Mom
La Leche League-International

Breastfeeding and Medication Safety
Dr. Hale
Motherisk
Kelly Mom's List
WHO's List (PDF)
WHO's List (HTML provided by Google)


Parenting Reference
Dr Sears
Child -led Introduction to Solids
Infact Canada


Pregnancy Resources
Empowered Childbirth
Midwifery Today




Add Me! - Search Engine Optimization


If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:



rss feed



 
Friday, August 25, 2006
Birth Control Pills and Legal Rape

Birth Control Pills and Legal Rape

  [Edit]

Now that both the US and Canada have made the morning after pill legal and available without a prescription it is time to continue down the path and end the legalized assault of women who choose to use the birth control pill.  Many people are concerned that the morning after pill will now become a regular form of birth control for some women (men of course not being responsible for birth control decisions; but that is a whole other post).  It may become a form of regular birth control, particularly for those who do not have sex very often; this is dangerous and should be discouraged.  However, for some this may be their only choice, because access to birth control pills is strictly controlled.

To get a prescription for birth control pills, at least here in Canada (Ontario), but also true elsewhere you must consent to a PAP test, often as frequently as every 12 months.  Forcing a woman to consent to have her vagina penetrated with a foreign object, the speculum is sexual assault. Sexual Assault is generally defined as:  


Sexual Assault is generally defined as:

Sexual Assault

  • Any form of sexual contact without voluntary consent (Adapted from the Criminal Code of Canada, Sec.270).
  • Kissing, fondling, sexual intercourse, anal intercourse, and oral sex are all examples of sexual assault if they are done without voluntary consent.
    Consent obtained through pressure, coercion, force, or threats of force is not voluntary consent. [1] 

Also:

Sexual penetration of any orifice of the victim's body by a body part or object, achieved through force, threat of force or coercion>[2]


Although the law varies by country and often by state or province; coercion or force negates consent.  While some women would consent to the PAP test without coercion or force it is there whether the woman chooses to acknowledge it or not.  The threat is that of an unintended pregnancy, or in worse cases continued good health as the birth control pill is used to treat certain medical conditions.  Some would argue that there are other means to prevent pregnancy and this is true, however some women choose not to or are unable to use barrier methods(condoms, diaphragms, cervical caps) and chemical methods (spermicide).  Women are also entitled to make their own medical decisions free from coercion and without the bias of medical practitioners and pharmacists.

An allergy to spermicide also eliminates many barrier methods as they depend on the combination of spermicide and the barrier.  An allergy to latex also makes barrier methods hard to use.  Non latex condoms are expensive and less effective[3].  In addition to all of that diaphragms and cervical caps are less effective if you have previously given birth[4].  Not to mention that using chemical methods (such as sponges, gels, films) require knowing you are going to have intercourse ahead of time (good luck if you have kids).  Also some couples would like the closeness of not using a condom without the risk of pregnancy.

Using diaphragms and cervical caps (except the Lea’s Shield) also requires fitting by a health professional which required consent which woman may be unwilling or unable to give (for religious reasons).

Though the birth control pill is not without its risks such as an increased risk of dangerous blood clots, osteoporosis, and even death; it is a woman’s right to weigh the benefits and risks, in consultation with a knowledgeable and unbiased professional and choose for herself.  This decision should not also rest on her willingness to have a PAP test, which may or may not be an important test that all women should have (see Cervical Specific Antigen and Anti-Malignin Antibody

We must empower women to make their own medical decisions and end legal rape.





   


[1] http://www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/SAC/nav01.cfm?nav01=23613&

[2] http://www.brown.edu/Student_Services/Health_Services/Health_Education/sexual_assault/saar.htm

[3] http://www.contraceptiononline.org/slides/slide01.cfm?q=std&dpg=10

[4] http://www.babycenter.com/refcap/baby/postpartumsex/1375288.html#cap

 


Posted at 01:38 pm by mysticeye

Veronica
August 25, 2006   05:51 PM PDT
 
Yee-haw! I'm right there with you. Day After shouldn't be birth control, and the pill should be readily accessible to women.
Andrea
August 25, 2006   05:46 PM PDT
 
Big reason why I got an IUD right there.

Of course, lots of doctors won't give you one unless you already have kids.
  

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry